The Guardian

'This is not a normal election'

The Guardian sent this email to their subscribers on March 12, 2024.

I spoke to Margaret Sullivan on your behalf
͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌     
The Guardian
  ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌   ‌
The Guardian @%‘%fl@@fi@m

Georgia Warren
Interim membership editor, Guardian US

Hi there,

As we face our third consecutive presidential election with Donald Trump on the ticket, we are lucky to have Margaret Sullivan, our country’s most incisive media critic, as a Guardian US columnist. (If you enjoy reading our expert columnists, please support us with a few dollars here.) I called her up to ask some questions on your behalf about how the media should responsibly cover this historic election:

***

Georgia Warren: You wrote recently in your Guardian column about how this isn't the time for coverage as usual. What does good news coverage of this election look like, in your view?

Margaret Sullivan: It's really important to make American citizens – and citizens of the world – aware that this is not a normal election. We are in a situation in the United States right now in which a quote-unquote “normal” candidate, Joe Biden, is running for re-election against a former president whom we know to have authoritarian tendencies (at the very least) and who has allies making plans that would move us in the direction of, if not fascism, then certainly authoritarian-style government.
Support the Guardian
How do journalists and editors avoid falling into the trap of creating a both-sides narrative of false equivalence while also maintaining impartiality?

Instead of focusing on performative neutrality, I think what we need to keep in mind is fairness. Fairness doesn't necessarily mean taking everything down the middle. It doesn’t mean equating, for example, Biden's gaffes and memory lapses with the 91 federal charges that Donald Trump is facing in several different cases. These things aren't equal, and to cover them equally actually does readers a disservice.

So how should the media cover the “normal” candidate in this election?

Of course, journalists need to cover Joe Biden rigorously and yes, cover his faults and his gaffes and all the bad stuff, too. Of course we want to pay attention to whether Biden is mentally acute enough to run for president. But Donald Trump is also nearly 80, and I don't see much attention paid to that. We all know by now that Biden is old, so writing endless stories about his age doesn't really inform the public in any useful way. This is not about making Biden look good. It's about doing our public service job of informing the public in a responsible way.

What do you think the media has learned about covering Trump since 2016?

One thing the media has learned is not to simply train the camera on Trump and let him say all kinds of things that mostly aren't true. Everyone knows for sure now that he does lie all the time, so real-time fact-checking has gotten better, as have decisions about whether to air his rallies and speeches live.

And what do you worry the media has not learned?

The thing that I don't think is better is the reliance on horse race coverage instead of more substantial coverage. Jay Rosen, the journalism professor at New York University, has coined an expression in which he urges the media to focus on – and this is his phrase – “not the odds, but the stakes”. So don't concentrate on who's going to win, but rather: what are the potential consequences of this election? I think that's really smart and I think it’s part of fairness too: covering substance. What are the candidates’ positions on the issues? What is their record? It’s journalists’ job to scrutinize these men’s records and talk and write about what they actually represent. So I think more of that and less surface stuff, less about public opinion and polls.

The media industry is in a precarious state – more than it was in 2016, more even than in 2020. How does that play into it?

Two American newspapers are going out of business every week. One of the things that worries me the most, and I've written a book about it, is the collapse of local newspapers and local journalism. Those newspapers had a really important role helping to give people in cities and states a common ground, a shared reality. We could disagree with our neighbor, but we shared the basic facts about what was happening nationally as well as in our communities.

You’ve been public editor of the New York Times and a media columnist for the Washington Post. What do you see as different about the Guardian?

One of the reasons I'm so happy to be writing for the Guardian once a week is that it is accessible to people. It doesn't have a paywall; you don’t get stopped when you're trying to read an important story. That is something that I think is increasingly important, and it makes the support that the Guardian gets from its readers crucial. It is extremely important to the business model, and readers do need to be aware of that. It's not either-or, it's both. The Guardian is both accessible to everyone and it needs the support of its readers. It has a different business model and it's one that I feel really proud to be a part of.

***

You can support the Guardian here. Any amount helps, and it takes on average just 37 seconds.

My thanks to Margaret for speaking to me. If there are other Guardian columnists you would like to hear from, do email me your suggestions, and any questions you have for them, at [email protected].

Best,
Georgia

P.S. You can sign up here to receive Margaret Sullivan’s Guardian’s columns in your inbox as soon as they are published. As well as writing weekly for the Guardian, Margaret is executive director for the Craig Newmark Center for Journalism Ethics and Security at Columbia Journalism School. She is also the author of an excellent memoir about her career in journalism, Newsroom Confidential: Lessons (and Worries) from an Ink-Stained Life.

---

Georgia Warren
Interim membership editor
Guardian US

Text-only version of this email

The Guardian                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Support us   The Guardian @%‘%fl@@fi@m Georgia Warren Interim membership editor, Guardian US Hi there, As we face our third consecutive presidential election with Donald Trump on the ticket, we are lucky to have Margaret Sullivan, our country’s most incisive media critic, as a Guardian US columnist. (If you enjoy reading our expert columnists, please support us with a few dollars here.) I called her up to ask some questions on your behalf about how the media should responsibly cover this historic election: *** Georgia Warren: You wrote recently in your Guardian column about how this isn't the time for coverage as usual. What does good news coverage of this election look like, in your view? Margaret Sullivan: It's really important to make American citizens – and citizens of the world – aware that this is not a normal election. We are in a situation in the United States right now in which a quote-unquote “normal” candidate, Joe Biden, is running for re-election against a former president whom we know to have authoritarian tendencies (at the very least) and who has allies making plans that would move us in the direction of, if not fascism, then certainly authoritarian-style government. Support the Guardian How do journalists and editors avoid falling into the trap of creating a both-sides narrative of false equivalence while also maintaining impartiality? Instead of focusing on performative neutrality, I think what we need to keep in mind is fairness. Fairness doesn't necessarily mean taking everything down the middle. It doesn’t mean equating, for example, Biden's gaffes and memory lapses with the 91 federal charges that Donald Trump is facing in several different cases. These things aren't equal, and to cover them equally actually does readers a disservice. So how should the media cover the “normal” candidate in this election? Of course, journalists need to cover Joe Biden rigorously and yes, cover his faults and his gaffes and all the bad stuff, too. Of course we want to pay attention to whether Biden is mentally acute enough to run for president. But Donald Trump is also nearly 80, and I don't see much attention paid to that. We all know by now that Biden is old, so writing endless stories about his age doesn't really inform the public in any useful way. This is not about making Biden look good. It's about doing our public service job of informing the public in a responsible way. What do you think the media has learned about covering Trump since 2016? One thing the media has learned is not to simply train the camera on Trump and let him say all kinds of things that mostly aren't true. Everyone knows for sure now that he does lie all the time, so real-time fact-checking has gotten better, as have decisions about whether to air his rallies and speeches live. And what do you worry the media has not learned? The thing that I don't think is better is the reliance on horse race coverage instead of more substantial coverage. Jay Rosen, the journalism professor at New York University, has coined an expression in which he urges the media to focus on – and this is his phrase – “not the odds, but the stakes”. So don't concentrate on who's going to win, but rather: what are the potential consequences of this election? I think that's really smart and I think it’s part of fairness too: covering substance. What are the candidates’ positions on the issues? What is their record? It’s journalists’ job to scrutinize these men’s records and talk and write about what they actually represent. So I think more of that and less surface stuff, less about public opinion and polls. The media industry is in a precarious state – more than it was in 2016, more even than in 2020. How does that play into it? Two American newspapers are going out of business every week. One of the things that worries me the most, and I've written a book about it, is the collapse of local newspapers and local journalism. Those newspapers had a really important role helping to give people in cities and states a common ground, a shared reality. We could disagree with our neighbor, but we shared the basic facts about what was happening nationally as well as in our communities. You’ve been public editor of the New York Times and a media columnist for the Washington Post. What do you see as different about the Guardian? One of the reasons I'm so happy to be writing for the Guardian once a week is that it is accessible to people. It doesn't have a paywall; you don’t get stopped when you're trying to read an important story. That is something that I think is increasingly important, and it makes the support that the Guardian gets from its readers crucial. It is extremely important to the business model, and readers do need to be aware of that. It's not either-or, it's both. The Guardian is both accessible to everyone and it needs the support of its readers. It has a different business model and it's one that I feel really proud to be a part of. *** You can support the Guardian here. Any amount helps, and it takes on average just 37 seconds. My thanks to Margaret for speaking to me. If there are other Guardian columnists you would like to hear from, do email me your suggestions, and any questions you have for them, at [email protected]. Best, Georgia P.S. You can sign up here to receive Margaret Sullivan’s Guardian’s columns in your inbox as soon as they are published. As well as writing weekly for the Guardian, Margaret is executive director for the Craig Newmark Center for Journalism Ethics and Security at Columbia Journalism School. She is also the author of an excellent memoir about her career in journalism, Newsroom Confidential: Lessons (and Worries) from an Ink-Stained Life. --- Georgia Warren Interim membership editor Guardian US Contact Us           You are receiving this email because you opted to receive messages about subscriptions, membership and contributions from Guardian News & Media Limited. If you no longer wish to receive emails about supporting The Guardian you can . Guardian News & Media Limited - a member of Guardian Media Group PLC. Registered Office: Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Registered in England No. 908396    
Show all

The Latest Emails Sent By The Guardian

More Emails, Deals & Coupons From The Guardian

Email Offers, Discounts & Promos From Our Top Stores